Pacat ca nu ai spus si motivul sau motivele pentru care ti-ai amintit definitia inselatului , ar fi fost comic (cred).

Oricum, definitia pare pertinenta si adevarata, insa din pacate, de multe ori, cu toate ca suna putin silly ,”it’s not what it looks like” , chiar nu este what it looks like si atunci ies o gramada de probleme aiurea fara sa fie nevoie.

I let how I feel drive me, and I’ll deal with the consequences later. If I need to think about whether I am cheating on my girlfriend or not, I’m probably in deep trouble already.

Also, if I need to think whether I want to kiss someone or not, I probably don’t want it bad enough.

Logic can merely help you realize that you should act on your feelings, or gut, or what have you, when it comes to this kind of things.

ily, you can’t cherry-pick your subtlety in this case: you need a third party. You need to actually do something, or rather, conniving in that you do not refrain from doing something you know you shouldn’t do.

And on your side note: what’s nice is being bothered by IM`s while writing down this comment. IM`s from you, no less.

I was picking up on a bit of subtlety there. By your definition, cheating = conniving rather than betraying.

Also, on a side note, I remember how long ago we agreed upon this, and think it`s nice that we still do.

But I do agree that two people should have similar values if they’re considering building something stable.